INDUSTRY INFO
differences between blown & cast stretch films
BLOWN STRETCH FILM
- MANUFACTURING PROCESS:
- Process: Created by melting resin and extruding it through a circular die. The film is then blown into a bubble, cooled by air, and collapsed into flat film.
- Cooling: Slower cooling process, leading to more crystalline structure.
- Orientation: Bi-axial orientation (primarily in the machine direction)
- PROPERTIES:
- Clarity: Generally, less clear and glossy due to the slower cooling process.
- Strength: Higher puncture and tear resistance because of the crystalline structure.
- Elasticity: Better memory, meaning it retains its stretch and cling properties longer.
- Noise: Noisier to unwind due to the structure.
- Cost: Typically, more expensive due to the complex manufacturing process.
- APPLICATIONS:
- Ideal for: Securing irregularly shaped loads, handling heavy-duty wrapping needs, and providing protection for long-term storage.
- Preferred for: Products requiring higher puncture resistance and better load retention over time.
CAST STRETCH FILM
- MANUFACTURING PROCESS:
- Process: Produced by melting resin and extruding it through a slot die, then cooling it on chilled rollers.
- Cooling: Faster cooling process, resulting in a more uniform film.
- Orientation: Uni-axial orientation (primarily in the machine direction).
- PROPERTIES:
- Clarity: Higher clarity and gloss, making it more transparent.
- Strength: Lower puncture resistance compared to blown film.
- Elasticity: Less memory, which means it can lose cling properties faster.
- Noise: Quieter to unwind because of the smoother surface.
- Cost: Generally, less expensive due to the simpler manufacturing process.
- APPLICATIONS:
- Ideal for: Wrapping uniform loads, lighter-duty applications, and when high clarity is needed.
- Preferred for: Products requiring better visual inspection, quieter application, and lower cost.
SUMMARY TABLE:
FEATURE: | BLOWN STRETCH FILM | CAST STRETCH FILM |
Manufacturing Process | Blown into a bubble, slow cooling | Extruded through a slot die, fast cooling |
Clarity | Less clear | High clarity and glossy |
Strength | HIgher puncture and tear resistance | Lower puncture resistance |
Elasticity | Better memory | Less memory |
Noise | Noisier to unwind | Quieter to unwind |
Cost | More expensive | Less expensive |
Ideal For | Irregular loads, heavy-duty, long term | Uniform loads, lighter-duty, high clarity needed |
Preferred For | Higher puncture resistance, load retention | Visual inspection, quieter application cost |
This comparison should help you understand the key differences between blown and cast stretch films and determine which type is best suited for your specific needs.
WRAPPING MACHINE INDUSTRY STANDARD PROFLE
PROFILE A
A pallet load with load footprint the same size as the pallet, with uniform shape and no protrusions
PROFILE B
A pallet load with load footprint different to the size of the pallet with the load slightly irregular shaped
PROFILE C
A pallet load with load footprint significantly different to the size of the pallet with the load highly irregular with sharp edges
differences between manual , semi-automated & fully-automated
MANNUAL WRAPPING
- THROUGHPUT: Limited by ability of labour
- PROFLE A: Suitable
- PROFILE B: Suitable
- PROFILE C: Suitable
- FLEXIBILITY: Highly flexible
- CONSISTENCY OF APPLICATION: Wrapping pattern dependant on operator
- FILM DAMAGE & WASTE: High
SEMI-AUTOMATIC WRAPPING
- THROUGHPUT: Cost effective in most throughputs
- PROFLE A: Suitable
- PROFILE B: Suitable
- PROFILE C: Not recommended
- FLEXIBILITY: Flexible
- CONSISTENCY OF APPLICATION: High
- FILM DAMAGE & WASTE: Low
FULLY-AUTOMATED WRAPPING
- THROUGHPUT: Requires large throughput
- PROFLE A: Suitable
- PROFILE B: Suitable
- PROFILE C: Not recommended
- FLEXIBILITY: Inflexible
- CONSISTENCY OF APPLICATION: High
- FILM DAMAGE & WASTE: Low